Maintaining competency in the latest suicidology research is essential for psychologists to deliver evidence-based, high-quality care to individuals at risk for suicide. The Fluid Vulnerability Theory (FVT), first proposed by Rudd (2006), provides a fundamental framework for understanding the dynamic and temporal nature of suicide risk. This review examines contemporary FVT research, highlighting key findings on risk-state fluctuations and their clinical implications for assessment, intervention, and prevention strategies. By integrating these advances into practice, psychologists can better identify at-risk individuals, tailor interventions to specific risk states, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Temporal Dynamics and Risk State Transitions
Current research efforts are moving away from solely predicting suicide risk towards a more nuanced understanding of the temporal progression of suicidal crises, with implications for time-sensitive interventions (Czyz et al., 2022; Kivelä et al., 2024). This emphasis on timing represents an important advancement in understanding suicidal behavior. Empirical evidence suggests distinct patterns among risk profiles: individuals with lower-risk profiles tend to stabilize in a single low-risk state, whereas those with high-risk profiles exhibit oscillations between two contrasting states—a lower-risk baseline and transient higher-risk phases (Brown et al., 2021; van Ballegooijen et al., 2022).
Emerging research underscores the distinct role of emotional regulation in sustaining psychological stability and evaluating suicide risk (Colmenero-Navarrete et al., 2022; Rogante et al., 2024). While low-risk individuals typically demonstrate rapid recovery following emotional dysregulation, high-risk patients exhibit prolonged vulnerability and erratic state transitions when exposed to disruptive triggers. This divergence underscores the vital function of self-modulation in preventing extended high-risk states. By employing temporal pattern analysis of emotional regulation, cognitive flexibility, and behavioral shifts, psychologists can identify pivotal transition points and implement targeted interventions informed by comprehensive risk assessments.
Consider these clinical examples in terms of different emotional regulation capabilities. Two patients experience relationship breakups. Jennifer (low-risk profile) feels devastated initially but engages her support system, uses healthy coping skills, and returns to baseline mood within a week. In contrast, David (high-risk profile) experiences the same trigger but shows prolonged emotional dysregulation lasting several weeks, with intrusive suicidal thoughts, sleep disruption, and inability to implement coping strategies effectively, requiring intensive intervention to prevent escalation. Consequently, treatment should prioritize strengthening emotional regulation skills, enhancing cognitive flexibility, and fostering adaptive behavioral responses to mitigate vulnerability and prevent crisis escalation in high-risk individuals.
Risk Factors and Their Complex Interactions
Research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic has yielded consequential insights into risk factor interactions within the FVT framework. Allan et al. (2021) identified loneliness and anxiety as distinct predictors of pandemic-related suicidal ideation, independent of other known risk factors. These findings empirically validate FVT’s core premise that specific vulnerabilities (e.g., emotional sensitivity traits) disproportionately amplify responses to environmental stressors. The pandemic context—characterized by sustained, unprecedented stress—serves as a compelling natural experiment demonstrating how acute systemic crises interact with baseline diatheses to elevate suicide risk. This evidence reinforces the need for dynamic risk assessment models that account for both stable vulnerabilities and situational stressors.
In military populations, Dempsey et al. (2023) identified that recent stressors – specifically relationship problems, military punishment, and perceived failure or humiliation – significantly increased the odds of suicide in the month prior to death. Importantly, these stressors distinguished those who only experienced suicidal ideation from those who died by suicide, suggesting these factors may contribute to the lethal transition from ideation to action. This distinction between ideation and action represents a crucial advancement in understanding the pathways to suicide completion.
As a clinical example, Sergeant Rodriguez had been managing mild depression successfully for two years. However, within one month, he experienced a relationship breakup, received disciplinary action for a minor infraction, and felt humiliated when passed over for promotion. Unlike previous stressors he had weathered, this cluster of recent stressors (relationship problems, military punishment, perceived failure) created a significant transition from chronic suicidal ideation to active planning and preparation, requiring immediate intervention.
Applications to Specific Populations and Conditions
The Fluid Vulnerability Theory (FVT) has been especially useful for examining suicide risk within specific populations. Rugo-Cook et al. (2021) applied the FVT framework to explore the link between posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and suicide, organizing existing knowledge about the mechanisms connecting these conditions into cognitive, emotional, behavioral, and physiological domains. By offering a structured approach to understanding how PTSD can increase vulnerability to suicide, this research provides valuable insights that can inform more targeted and effective prevention and intervention strategies.
Brown et al. (2021) investigated potential subtypes of suicide risk among active duty military personnel, proposing three distinct groups: individuals who experience suicidal ideation without engaging in suicidal behavior; those who exhibit suicidal behavior preceded by highly variable patterns of ideation; and those whose suicidal behavior emerges through discontinuous or atypical pathways. This study highlights that these subtypes may follow different, nonlinear trajectories of risk, underscoring the need for tailored approaches to assessment, intervention, and prevention. By identifying and characterizing these distinct risk profiles, the research represents a significant step toward more nuanced and effective suicide evaluation, management, and treatment strategies within military populations.
Clinical Implications and Intervention Approaches
Based on the research, here are five evidence-based practice tips for psychologists working with patients at risk for suicide:
- Monitor Temporal Dynamics of Risk: To effectively monitor suicide risk, implement frequent, temporal assessments that capture fluctuating states rather than relying on static factors. For high-risk patients, tools like ecological momentary assessments or daily diaries can help track risk patterns and identify transitions between low- and high-risk states (Czyz et al., 2022; van Ballegooijen et al., 2022).
- Assess Self-Regulatory Processes: Assess patients’ self-regulation during acute stress, targeting early signs of dysregulation, ineffective coping strategies, or decompensation as significant intervention points to prevent escalation to high-risk states (Colmenero-Navarrete et al., 2022). Here’s a clinical illustration: Dr. Patel asks Anna to describe her last episode of emotional dysregulation. Anna reports that when criticized by her supervisor, she immediately felt overwhelmed, couldn’t think clearly, isolated herself, and ruminated for hours without using any coping strategies. This assessment reveals compromised self-regulation capacity, prompting Dr. Patel to focus treatment on building distress tolerance and emotional regulation skills as suicide prevention strategies.
- Target Specific Mechanisms in Treatment: Create targeted treatment plans addressing loneliness and anxiety sensitivity (Allan et al., 2021). For those impacted by collective stressors, focus on enhancing social connections and mitigating anxiety/agitation.
- Monitor Acute Stressors: Closely monitor recent stressors—particularly relationship conflicts, perceived failures/humiliations, and disciplinary actions—as these factors differentiate suicidal ideation from attempts, especially in military populations (Dempsey, et al, 2023).
- Differentiate Intervention by Risk Subtype: Identify distinct suicidal subtypes with unique nonlinear trajectories (Brown et al., 2021). Customize assessments and interventions to each patient’s risk pattern for personalized prevention.
Conclusion
Recent research has substantially advanced our understanding of the Fluid Vulnerability Hypothesis, moving beyond static risk factors to dynamic processes that explain when and how suicidal behavior emerges. The emphasis on nonlinear change processes, temporal dynamics, and the complex interaction of risk factors provides a more sophisticated framework for conceptualizing suicide risk. These advances offer promising directions for more precise assessment and targeted interventions, potentially improving our ability to prevent suicidal behavior across diverse populations and contexts.
References
Allan, N. P., Volarov, M., Koscinski, B., Pizzonia, K. L., Potter, K., Accorso, C., Saulnier, K. G., Ashrafioun, L., Stecker, T., Suhr, J., & Allan, D. M. (2021). Lonely, anxious, and uncertain: Critical risk factors for suicidal desire during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Research, 304, 114-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114144
Brown, L. A., Bryan, C. J., Butner, J. E., Tabares, J. V., Young-McCaughan, S., Hale, W. J., Fina, B. A., Foa, E. B., Resick, P. A., Taylor, D. J., Coon, H., Williamson, D. E., Dondanville, K. A., Borah, E. V., McLean, C. P., Wachen, J. S., Pruiksma, K. E., Hernandez, A. M., Litz, B. T., Peterson, A. L. (2021). Identifying suicidal subtypes and dynamic indicators of increasing and decreasing suicide risk in active duty military personnel: Study protocol. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 21, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100752
Bryan, C. J., Butner, J. E., May, A. M., Rugo, K. F., Harris, J., Oakey, D. N., Rozek, D. C., & Bryan, A. O. (2020) . Nonlinear change processes and the emergence of suicidal behavior: A conceptual model based on the fluid vulnerability theory of suicide. New Ideas in Psychology, 57, 100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100758
Colmenero-Navarrete, L., García-Sancho, E., & Salguero, J. M. (2022). Relationship Between Emotion Regulation and Suicide Ideation and Attempt in Adults and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research, 26(4), 1702–1735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2021.1999872
Czyz, E. K., Koo, H. J., Al-Dajani, N., Kentopp, S. D., Jiang, A., & King, C. A. (2022). Temporal profiles of suicidal thoughts in daily life: Results from two mobile-based monitoring studies with high-risk adolescents. Journal of psychiatric research, 153, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.050
Dempsey, C. L., Benedek, D. M., Zuromski, K. L., Nock, M. K., Brent, D. A., Ao, J., Georg, M. W., & Ursano, R. J. (2023). Recent stressful experiences and suicide risk: Implications for suicide prevention and intervention in U.S. Army soldiers. Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice, 5(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.prcp.20220027
Kivelä, L. M. M., Fried, E. I., van der Does, W., & Antypa, N. (2024). Examining contemporaneous and temporal associations of real-time suicidal ideation using network analysis. Psychological Medicine, 54(12), 3357–3365. https://doi:10.1017/S003329172400151X
Rogante, E., Cifrodelli, M., Sarubbi, S., Costanza, A., Erbuto, D., Berardelli, I., & Pompili, M. (2024). The role of emotion Dysregulation in Understanding Suicide Risk: A Systematic Review of the literature. Healthcare, 12(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12020169
Rudd, M. D. (2006). Fluid Vulnerability Theory: A Cognitive Approach to Understanding the Process of Acute and Chronic Suicide Risk. In T. E. Ellis (Ed.), Cognition and suicide: Theory, research, and therapy (pp. 355–368). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11377-016
Rugo-Cook, K. F., Kerig, P. K., Crowell, S. E., & Bryan, C. J. (2021) . Fluid vulnerability theory as a framework for understanding the association between posttraumatic stress disorder and suicide: A narrative review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 34(6), 1080-1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22782
van Ballegooijen, W., Littlewood, D. L., Nielsen, E., Kapur, N., & Gooding, P. (2022). The temporal relationships between defeat, entrapment and suicidal ideation: ecological momentary assessment study. BJPsych Open, 8(4), e105. doi:10.1192/bjo.2022.68
John D. Gavazzi, PsyD, ABPP
Board Certified in Clinical Psychology
Correspondence: john.gavazzi@gmail.com