Sport psychology, defined as the application of psychological principles to enhance performance, well-being, and development in sport and other high-performance settings, has increasingly recognized that mental health is a core determinant of performance. However, minority stress experienced by LGBTQ+ athletes is often framed as an identity concern rather than a performance-relevant factor. Minority stress is a sociocultural process that places chronic cognitive and physiological demands on individuals exposed to stigma (Frost & Meyer, 2023; Meyer, 2003). In sport, these demands can directly influence training consistency, decision-making, recovery, and competitive execution.
Performance environments, defined here as settings characterized by evaluation, public visibility, and outcome-based pressure (e.g., competitive sport, performing arts, military), can intensify these effects. Within these contexts, as conversations in psychology increasingly emphasize burnout, retention, and ethical care, integrating minority stress frameworks into performance models aligns with broader priorities across American Board of Professional Psychology specialties, including competence, evidence-based practice, and public trust. Failure to account for minority stress creates gaps in assessment, formulation, and intervention that compromise both care quality and performance outcomes.
Minority Stress Theory in Sport Contexts
Minority Stress Theory (MST; Frost & Meyer, 2023; Meyer, 2003) provides a framework for understanding how stigma-related stress affects sexual and gender minoritized (LGBTQ+) individuals. Although MST has been applied across multiple minoritized populations, this article focuses specifically on LGBTQ+ athletes. The model distinguishes between distal stressors (e.g., discrimination, exclusion) and proximal stressors (e.g., identity concealment, internalized stigma), both of which are highly relevant in sport contexts.
Distal stressors in sport include harassment, exclusionary team norms, biased selection practices, and organizational silence following discriminatory incidents (Denison et al., 2021; Xiang et al., 2023). Proximal stressors arise when athletes must monitor identity expression to maintain safety or belonging, particularly in high-visibility environments with power differentials (Meyer, 2003). Together, these stressors create ongoing demands that can affect both well-being and performance.
Sport settings may further amplify minority stress by limiting both psychological privacy, defined as control over disclosure of one’s identity and personal experiences, and physical privacy, including shared locker rooms, travel, and living spaces. These conditions increase identity-related vulnerability. Qualitative research with LGBTQ+ collegiate athletes describes a “double bind,” in which authenticity supports well-being while increasing exposure to scrutiny and potential performance consequences (Brody et al., 2022). From a performance perspective, minority stress imposes a chronic load on attentional control, emotional regulation, sleep, and recovery systems.
Empirical Evidence
LGBTQ+ individuals experience higher rates of chronic stress, discrimination, and mental health concerns, consistent with minority stress processes, compared to non-LGBTQ+ individuals (Lu et al., 2025). Within sport, these disparities are often amplified. LGBTQ+ athletes report greater exposure to identity-based stressors, vigilance, and identity management demands than their non-LGBTQ+ peers (Denison et al., 2021).
Systematic reviews document widespread discrimination and exclusion across youth, collegiate, and elite sport, which are associated with poorer mental health outcomes, reduced sense of belonging, and increased vigilance (Denison et al., 2021; Xiang et al., 2023). These outcomes are driven by exposure to stigma-related stress rather than identity itself. In performance contexts, this chronic vigilance and identity management burden diverts attentional resources away from focus and task execution.
Barriers to care further compound these effects. LGBTQ+ athletes report concerns about confidentiality, fear of career consequences, and mistrust of sport-affiliated providers, which may delay or prevent help-seeking and allow stress to accumulate (DeFoor et al., 2018; Brody et al., 2022). These barriers increase the likelihood that minority stress remains unaddressed and continues to impact performance.
Recent research also highlights several protective factors for LGBTQ+ athletes. Inclusive team climates, explicit allyship from coaches and leadership, access to identity-affirming care, and enforced organizational policies are associated with improved well-being, retention, and performance-related outcomes (McGeorge et al., 2025). These findings underscore that minority stress is shaped by modifiable environmental conditions.
Implications for Researchers
MST also provides a framework for operationalizing identity-related stressors in research, including concealment, vigilance, and perceived climate. Measuring these variables alongside performance indicators allows researchers to examine minority stress as a dynamic predictor of performance rather than treating identity as a static demographic variable. This framing positions minority stress as a measurable, modifiable performance variable rather than solely a sociocultural construct.
Longitudinal and within-person designs are particularly well suited to examining how changes in identity safety relate to confidence, concentration, recovery, and competitive consistency over time. Key gaps include athlete retention and dropout among LGBTQ+ athletes, intersectional identities, and system-level interventions that modify team or organizational climate rather than focusing solely on individual coping (Denison et al., 2021; The Trevor Project, 2021). Addressing these gaps will strengthen the evidence base for understanding minority stress as a performance-relevant process.
Implications for Board-Certified Psychologists
Minority stress has direct clinical relevance for board-certified psychologists. Comprehensive assessment should extend beyond symptom presentation to include sport climate, identity safety, discrimination exposure, and identity concealment demands. Failure to assess these factors limits both clinical effectiveness and ethical care (DeFoor et al., 2018).
Interventions should integrate minority stress frameworks within existing approaches (e.g., cognitive behavioral, acceptance-based, performance-focused) rather than treating them as separate. Clinical and performance-focused strategies may include contextualizing threat appraisals within real environmental risk, supporting values-driven action while acknowledging vigilance costs, and incorporating identity safety planning into performance routines. These approaches allow clinicians to address both performance demands and identity-related stressors in an integrated manner.
Training and supervision should explicitly address minority stress, disclosure decision-making, advocacy, and provider-related dual-role complexities. Embedding these competencies within standard training pathways strengthens preparedness for real-world sport and performance contexts. This integration supports more competent, responsive, and ethically grounded care for LGBTQ+ athletes.
Implications for Sport Organizations and Systems
Expecting LGBTQ+ athletes to demonstrate individual resilience in environments that generate minority stress is insufficient. Organizational factors, including heterosexist norms, leadership silence, and inconsistent policy enforcement, contribute directly to athlete stress (Denison et al., 2021). These conditions shift responsibility onto athletes to adapt to harmful environments rather than addressing the systemic sources of that stress.
Accordingly, sport organizations and systems should emphasize clear policies, consistent enforcement, education for coaches and staff, climate assessments, and accountability mechanisms (Athlete Ally, 2021). Inclusion should be framed as a performance sustainability issue rather than a symbolic initiative. Visibility efforts alone are not a substitute for structural change, particularly when underlying norms and practices remain unaddressed.
Inclusive climates are associated with indicators of effectiveness and success in sport (Cunningham & Nite, 2020). These findings reinforce that identity safety and performance are mutually reinforcing rather than competing priorities. When organizations actively reduce minority stress, they create conditions that support both athlete well-being and consistent performance outcomes.
Conclusion
Athlete identity, well-being, and performance are interdependent. Minority stress among LGBTQ+ athletes is a modifiable determinant of both mental health and performance, and treating identity affirmation as peripheral undermines outcomes in both domains. Researchers, clinicians, and sport organizations should implement evidence-informed strategies that reduce minority stress and promote environments where athletes can thrive.
Addressing these gaps requires expanded training in LGBTQ-affirmative care, sport-specific DEI and climate training, and organizational consultation to support inclusive cultures. These efforts are most effective when integrated early in training, with minority stress frameworks embedded in sport psychology and clinical curricula. Such integration strengthens both ethical practice and performance-focused care.
Although this article focuses on sport, these dynamics extend to other high-visibility performance settings such as the performing arts, military service, and executive leadership. In these contexts, identity disclosure and evaluative pressures similarly shape performance outcomes. Recognizing these parallels underscores the broader relevance of minority stress as a performance variable across domains.
References
Athlete Ally. (2021). Beyond the checklist: Integrating LGBTQI+ inclusivity into your team and department culture [Coach resource guide]. https://www.athleteally.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Coach-Resources_-Flow-Chart-Recruiting-Form-Guide.pdf
Brody, E., Scott, D. T., & Pariera, K. L. (2022). LGBTQ+ collegiate athletes and the double bind: Insights from the experiences of out varsity athletes. International Journal of Communication, 16, 21.
Cunningham, G. B., & Nite, C. (2020). LGBT diversity and inclusion, community characteristics, and success. Journal of Sport Management, 34(6), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2019-0338
DeFoor, M. T., Stepleman, L. M., & Mann, P. C. (2018). Improving wellness for LGB collegiate student-athletes through sports medicine: A narrative review. Sports Medicine-Open, 4(1), 48.
Denison, E., Bevan, N., & Jeanes, R. (2021). Reviewing evidence of LGBTQ+ discrimination and exclusion in sport. Sport Management Review, 24(3), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2020.09.003
Frost, D. M., & Meyer, I. H. (2023). Minority stress theory: Application, critique, and continued relevance. Current Opinion in Psychology.
Lu, J. A., Soltani, S., Austin, S. B., Rehkopf, D. H., Lunn, M. R., & Langston, M. E. (2025). Mental health disparities by sexual orientation and gender identity in the All of Us Research Program. JAMA Network Open, 8(1), e2456264.
McGeorge, C. R., Walsdorf, A. A., & Toomey, R. B. (2025). Going beyond a training to foster LGBTQ inclusive collegiate athletic contexts: Next steps. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport. https://doi.org/10.17161/jis.v18i3.23437
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.
The Trevor Project. (2021). LGBTQ youth sports participation. [Research Brief]. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/LGBTQ-Youth-and-Sports_-September-Research-Brief-2.pdf
Xiang, M., Soh, K. G., Xu, Y., Ahrari, S., & Zakaria, N. S. (2023). Experiences of LGBTQ student-athletes in college sports: A meta-ethnography. Heliyon, 9(6).
Tess M. Kilwein, PhD, ABPP, CMPC
Board Certified in Clinical Psychology
Correspondence: tess.m.kilwein@gmail.com